From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RCS, again: another removed functionality: undo last-checkin Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 22:05:00 +0300 Message-ID: <83r3lql1gj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87oagx6tzz.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <55FF4026.2050004@yandex.ru> <83si68nu4i.fsf@gnu.org> <56000DEB.1000306@yandex.ru> <83si67n4ch.fsf@gnu.org> <5600373A.6090206@yandex.ru> <83oagvn1lz.fsf@gnu.org> <56003D57.2080102@yandex.ru> <83mvwfmviy.fsf@gnu.org> <56005B96.2090006@yandex.ru> <83h9mnmtwj.fsf@gnu.org> <560152B5.7090005@yandex.ru> <8337y6mut5.fsf@gnu.org> <5601A504.4080807@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1442948716 25909 80.91.229.3 (22 Sep 2015 19:05:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 19:05:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 22 21:05:07 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeSsF-0007C9-8y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 21:05:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42193 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeSsE-0006Ld-FO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:05:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41734) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeSs2-0006Kb-6Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:04:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeSry-0003tC-UG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:04:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:44046) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeSry-0003so-MT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:04:50 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NV300000E0FJ300@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 22:04:48 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NV30004HEC0FW70@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 22:04:48 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <5601A504.4080807@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190251 Archived-At: > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 21:59:16 +0300 > > On 09/22/2015 04:45 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > I agree. I think "rollback" should always trigger a warning, with any > > VCS. > > Not sure what you mean. `vc-rollback' would be a command invoked > explicitly by the user. > > Maybe it would show a warning too Yes, I think it should. > but the fact that 'git revert' is going to be used instead of 'git > reset', deserves a separate warning. The warning could be worded differently in that case. > And if we're going to warn about doing rollback either way, the second > warning is more likely to fly under the user's radar ("why are you > asking me this again? yes already!"), which is kinda bad. I meant a single warning, not 2 of them.