From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21557: 25.0.50; HTML renders text invisible Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 08:10:59 +0300 Message-ID: <83r3lhdd3w.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mvw7dmoq.fsf@gnu.org> <83io6vdjir.fsf@gnu.org> <831tdieldl.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443520437 27437 80.91.229.3 (29 Sep 2015 09:53:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:53:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, 21557@debbugs.gnu.org To: Katsumi Yamaoka Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 29 11:53:46 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZgrbV-0007y4-J0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:53:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49094 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZgrbU-0001k3-HA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 05:53:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33377) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZgnC0-00055v-7u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 01:11:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZgnBv-000418-2X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 01:11:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58125) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZgnBv-000412-0V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 01:11:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZgnBt-0006tC-Qv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 01:11:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 05:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21557 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21557-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21557.144350345226468 (code B ref 21557); Tue, 29 Sep 2015 05:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21557) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Sep 2015 05:10:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47096 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZgnBj-0006sn-Qq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 01:10:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:34057) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZgnBg-0006sf-H8 for 21557@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 01:10:50 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NVF00700AAMZZ00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 21557@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 08:10:47 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NVF007L6ADYTY40@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 08:10:47 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:107031 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 08:02:17 +0900 > From: Katsumi Yamaoka > Cc: rms@gnu.org, 21557@debbugs.gnu.org > > On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 16:14:46 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> + (when (and (or fg bg) (>= (display-color-cells) 256)) > > > I wonder whether 256 above should be replaced with a much lower > > number, like 88, perhaps? > > 256 means `Depth 8 Pseudo Color', i.e., 24bit color (R:8bit, > G:8bit, B:8bit) but only 256 cells in the color pallet, AFAIK. > It matches shr-color.el that calculates colors based on 24bit. > But I don't know what is 88-color system. Is it not based on > 24bit color? If not, a color shr-color offers will be too dim. 88-color modes are supported by newer versions of xterm. My reasoning was that when you have 88 colors to use, shr-color-visible-luminance-min might do its job well enough for us to be able to honor the colors requested by HTML.