From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 29c360e: Ensure redisplay after "C-x C-e" Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2015 17:54:34 +0200 Message-ID: <83r3k0o5ad.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20151106093011.17282.48378@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <83vb9fqjvr.fsf@gnu.org> <83si4jqh5b.fsf@gnu.org> <83h9kzqedf.fsf@gnu.org> <83fv0jq6ak.fsf@gnu.org> <83y4e9nov8.fsf@gnu.org> <874mgwj14g.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1446998101 13434 80.91.229.3 (8 Nov 2015 15:55:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 15:55:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, bruce.connor.am@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 08 16:54:51 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvSIt-00010I-DW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 16:54:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47828 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvSIs-0002rg-6B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 10:54:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33117) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvSIp-0002ra-4m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 10:54:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvSIo-0007XT-CH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 10:54:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:32872) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvSIk-0007X2-Gc; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 10:54:42 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NXI00L006KI4W00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 17:54:37 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NXI00KDI6V1XF70@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 17:54:37 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <874mgwj14g.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193614 Archived-At: > From: David Kastrup > Cc: Stefan Monnier , bruce.connor.am@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2015 10:23:27 +0100 > > 5% slowdown in overall operation for addressing a redisplay quirk seems > like a bad tradeoff. Accurate display is not a "quirk". A "real-time display editor" shouldn't produce display that is out of sync with the internal state, certainly not when Emacs is idle.