From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ELPA policy Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 20:49:09 +0200 Message-ID: <83r3jxlmfu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ziyuaqhl.fsf@petton.fr> <87fv0labbf.fsf@web.de> <87y4eda0kl.fsf@petton.fr> <22074.42230.156669.584780@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> <87ziyoxvdp.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <83k2psnzyh.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvuorz7n.fsf@gmail.com> <8337wfon3f.fsf@gnu.org> <56401834.8080402@yandex.ru> <83ziynma4s.fsf@gnu.org> <5640C6A0.5010709@yandex.ru> <83twovm9es.fsf@gnu.org> <868u65afvh.fsf@stephe-leake.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447181373 27555 80.91.229.3 (10 Nov 2015 18:49:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:49:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: aaronecay@gmail.com, Stromeko@nexgo.de, stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, dgutov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: John Wiegley Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 10 19:49:26 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwDys-0007rk-QU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:49:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34915 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwDys-0006pd-CW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:49:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50399) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwDyk-0006pO-OF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:49:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwDyf-00057f-V9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:49:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:60106) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwDyf-00057a-Lg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:49:09 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NXM001003TJ4W00@mtaout28.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 20:48:02 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NXM0004F481OS20@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 20:48:02 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.184 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193925 Archived-At: > From: John Wiegley > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , aaronecay@gmail.com, Stromeko@nexgo.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov > Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:28:26 -0800 > > Large packages like CEDET should move outside of Emacs.git and into Elpa.git. "Should" based on what? just the fact that it's large? I think we should decide this stuff on a case by case basis. For example: > If xref.el depends on CEDET, it would move to Elpa.git as well. IMO, the exact opposite: if there are core features that we want to be in Emacs no matter what, and those features depend on a package which could be a candidate to move to ELPA, that package should NOT move to ELPA.