From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: member inconsistency? Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 16:15:57 +0200 Message-ID: <83r3h0xyhu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87twly2iye.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <871t929f1e.fsf@gmx.net> <87oac5s2a7.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9hx8dfr.fsf@gmx.net> <87h9hwadi1.fsf@igel.home> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1454077009 28797 80.91.229.3 (29 Jan 2016 14:16:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 14:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: p.stephani2@gmail.com, stephen.berman@gmx.net, bojohan@gnu.org, mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 29 15:16:41 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aP9qq-0006bH-5j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 15:16:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34492 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aP9qk-0004HE-D8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 09:16:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51021) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aP9qW-0004Gv-HL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 09:16:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aP9qR-0001Zt-Qq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 09:16:20 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:42332) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aP9qR-0001Zp-NS; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 09:16:15 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4019 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aP9qQ-0004U7-LB; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 09:16:15 -0500 In-reply-to: <87h9hwadi1.fsf@igel.home> (message from Andreas Schwab on Fri, 29 Jan 2016 11:25:42 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:198994 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 11:25:42 +0100 > Cc: Philipp Stephani , > Nicolas Goaziou , > Johan Bockgård , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Stephen Berman writes: > > > Oh, thanks for the pointer. So the patch I proposed reverts a change > > Stefan deliberately made more than eight years ago. > > IMHO that change was wrong. It made CHECK_LIST_CONS a no-op, and there > was nothing wrong with it before Stefan's change. But given that we've lived with it for more than 8 years, the revert should have been done on master, not the release branch, IMO.