From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23431: 25.0.93; EWW hangs Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 20:41:52 +0300 Message-ID: <83r3djjaxr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bn4nx1iq.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <87zis75ibn.fsf@gnus.org> <87d1p35e2g.fsf@gnus.org> <8360uvkt9y.fsf@gnu.org> <874maf5cqb.fsf@gnus.org> <8337pzksce.fsf@gnu.org> <87shxz3wfe.fsf@gnus.org> <83wpnbjc8c.fsf@gnu.org> <878tzr3vje.fsf@gnus.org> <83twifjb9k.fsf@gnu.org> <87vb2v2g95.fsf@gnus.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1462297421 4448 80.91.229.3 (3 May 2016 17:43:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 17:43:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23431@debbugs.gnu.org, jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 03 19:43:30 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1axeM5-0000ZZ-Gu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 19:43:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42542 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axeM1-0001oK-Rm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 13:43:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56938) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axeLt-0001dh-2x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 13:43:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axeLh-0005pL-F0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 13:43:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51525) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axeLh-0005mt-BH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 13:43:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1axeLd-0001yS-T6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 13:43:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 17:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23431 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23431-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23431.14622973517551 (code B ref 23431); Tue, 03 May 2016 17:43:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23431) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2016 17:42:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35629 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1axeL5-0001xg-KI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 13:42:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37096) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1axeL1-0001xR-Lf for 23431@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 13:42:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axeKm-00056J-CL for 23431@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 13:42:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:56453) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axeKX-0004r0-4F; Tue, 03 May 2016 13:41:53 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1296 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1axeKR-0005Xr-2z; Tue, 03 May 2016 13:41:47 -0400 In-reply-to: <87vb2v2g95.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Tue, 03 May 2016 19:39:02 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:117667 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 23431@debbugs.gnu.org, jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr > Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 19:39:02 +0200 > > But anyway, this is all besides to point: The question is still whether > we can detect that the animation is making Emacs slow, and whether > injecting some more delay (dynamically) into the animation timeout will > fix it. Shouldn't we first understand why Emacs is so slow? See my message about the profile.