From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emphasizing the top of the frame Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 21:51:57 +0300 Message-ID: <83r373t036.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83zilsuvw4.fsf@gnu.org> <83y41cuvak.fsf@gnu.org> <581064F8.5060804@gmx.at> <83funjuxp8.fsf@gnu.org> <5810A216.9080304@gmx.at> <83bmy7uuc5.fsf@gnu.org> <5810BC6B.6020003@gmx.at> <834m3zupgm.fsf@gnu.org> <5810EE37.70703@gmx.at> <83shrjt0lt.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477508000 30088 195.159.176.226 (26 Oct 2016 18:53:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 18:53:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: john@yates-sheets.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rudalics@gmx.at Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 26 20:53:16 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bzTJr-0005Au-Ef for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:52:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36878 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzTJu-0000nA-0T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55378) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzTJ3-0000kQ-7u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:52:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzTJ2-0005VT-J3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:52:09 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:40606) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzTIv-0005U0-Ak; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:52:01 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2604 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bzTIt-0006AO-W6; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:52:01 -0400 In-reply-to: <83shrjt0lt.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Wed, 26 Oct 2016 21:40:46 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208852 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 21:40:46 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, john@yates-sheets.org > > > Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:56:07 +0200 > > From: martin rudalics > > CC: john@yates-sheets.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > > >> But for that it (1) has to "walk the window tree as well" and (2) know > > >> where to draw the minibuffer window. > > > > > > No, it doesn't. The window glyph matrices on TTY frames are actually > > > portions of the frame glyph matrix, so whenever a window's glyphs are > > > updated by xdisp.c, the corresponding glyphs of the frame are > > > automagically updated as well. > > > > Looks like changing the minibuffer position is harder for TTY frames. > > I'm not sure. Btw, I'm not sure this is even desirable for TTY frames. Does anyone really run huge xterm windows on such large displays?