From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: When should ralloc.c be used? Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 09:39:08 +0300 Message-ID: <83r36zr75f.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83h98nidvd.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg3rvtsf.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83k2dihpm9.fsf@gnu.org> <8760p2wzgj.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <838ttyhhzu.fsf@gnu.org> <871szqwu51.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <831szqhbc2.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1itt79z.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> <7baa18d4-2b09-caa8-005e-29008a383ad1@cs.ucla.edu> <83mvhwrgd5.fsf@gnu.org> <8539f38f-9a11-44c3-4de7-bb974c96206c@cs.ucla.edu> <83d1iq5ib1.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3753c8j.fsf@gnu.org> <83r374wh32.fsf@gnu.org> <83mvhruyrh.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477723195 31916 195.159.176.226 (29 Oct 2016 06:39:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 06:39:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 29 08:39:51 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c0NIu-0006qA-RO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 08:39:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53458 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0NIx-0002uF-Go for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 02:39:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45731) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0NIN-0002tZ-Hi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 02:39:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0NIK-0002Lc-Ft for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 02:39:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47597) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0NIK-0002LW-CX; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 02:39:08 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4662 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1c0NIB-0007OQ-NC; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 02:39:00 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:13:19 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208957 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:13:19 -0400 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > I just did 'time temacs -batch -l loadup'. It took over 18 seconds. > We have a long way to go to make that fast enough. Try the patch I pointed to in a previous message, and see what kind of speedup is possible by 2 simple measures.