From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24890: 25.1; Several documentation problems Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 20:53:15 +0200 Message-ID: <83r36jdv50.fsf@gnu.org> References: <834m3ji36h.fsf@gnu.org> <838tsrfgig.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1478804101 5766 195.159.176.226 (10 Nov 2016 18:55:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 18:55:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 24890@debbugs.gnu.org To: Jorge Morais Neto Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 10 19:54:57 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c4uUL-0004OT-V6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 19:54:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48693 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c4uUO-0002TS-Pg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:54:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33822) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c4uUB-0002QW-Pf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:54:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c4uU6-000138-EI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:54:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37244) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c4uU6-000130-Bi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:54:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c4uU6-00041H-5o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:54:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 18:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24890 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24890-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24890.147880400615407 (code B ref 24890); Thu, 10 Nov 2016 18:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24890) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Nov 2016 18:53:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52643 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c4uTV-00040R-VH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:53:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42375) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c4uTU-00040E-8w for 24890@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:53:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c4uTO-0000V5-DL for 24890@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:53:19 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47188) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c4uTO-0000Uz-AH; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:53:18 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4888 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1c4uTM-000292-R2; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:53:17 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Jorge Morais Neto on Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:10:19 -0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:125578 Archived-At: > From: Jorge Morais Neto > Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:10:19 -0200 > Cc: 24890-done@debbugs.gnu.org > > On 10 November 2016 at 14:26, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> From: Jorge Morais Neto > >> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 12:36:58 -0200 > >> Cc: 24890@debbugs.gnu.org > >> In git (branch emacs-25), the docstring of outline-hide-sublevels is only: > >> "Hide everything but the top LEVELS levels of headers, in whole buffer. > >> This also unhides the top heading-less body, if any. > >> [...] > > > > Maybe I'm missing something, but what does "Hide everything but the > > top LEVELS levels of headers" mean, if not that all the headers of > > those levels are revealed? > > I parse that excerpt as "Hide (everything but the top LEVELS levels of > headers)", with parenthesis used for grouping as in Mathematics. But > in an outline buffer, "everything but the top LEVELS levels of > headers" means "headers of level > LEVELS and all bodies". Therefore > I interpret the excerpt as "hide (headers of level > LEVELS and all > bodies)", with no action for headers of level ≤ LEVELS. Thus if a > header of level ≤ LEVELS started hidden, in principle it would stay > hidden. Perhaps I am just misunderstanding English. My native and > primary language is Portuguese. If you think the current wording is > clear then we can leave it as is. Yes, I think it's clear.