From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: i18n/l10n summary Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 16:06:19 +0300 Message-ID: <83r2x88vuc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <0aca6c65-4610-44c2-99c4-6cbe7aa68c9a@default> <46B40C87-EAE0-4DDA-AF4D-EF6392FF8A47@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1500728832 13758 195.159.176.226 (22 Jul 2017 13:07:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 13:07:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jean-Christophe Helary Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 22 15:07:09 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dYu7d-00031h-Rv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 15:07:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47166 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dYu7g-0002NV-4F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 09:07:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38939) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dYu74-0002NO-02 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 09:06:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dYu6z-00042Y-1n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 09:06:29 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44075) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dYu6y-00042U-V9; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 09:06:24 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4229 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dYu6y-0003fO-E9; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 09:06:24 -0400 In-reply-to: <46B40C87-EAE0-4DDA-AF4D-EF6392FF8A47@gmail.com> (message from Jean-Christophe Helary on Sat, 22 Jul 2017 21:48:29 +0900) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:216937 Archived-At: > From: Jean-Christophe Helary > Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 21:48:29 +0900 > > > > On Jul 18, 2017, at 8:22, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote: > >>>> The discussion so far seems to point at modifying 'message' and > >>>> the likes so that developers don't have to bother with any l10n > >>>> mechanism on their part (besides for writing clean strings). > >> > >> Just as a reminder, we'll need to update all the texi files so that they include: > >> @documentlanguage > >> @documentencoding > > > > Is it ok to proceed with that ? > > I don't think there was a reply to that so I guess that's a yes. Actually, I didn't reply because I didn't understand what was the question. Can you remind me?