From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why does dired go through extra efforts to avoid unibyte names Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2018 20:14:21 +0200 Message-ID: <83r2r49nr6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83lghlfinq.fsf@gnu.org> <83tvw3asgk.fsf@gnu.org> <837eswbri4.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1515175979 4908 195.159.176.226 (5 Jan 2018 18:12:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 18:12:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 05 19:12:55 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eXWUA-0000v3-BL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 19:12:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52082 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eXWW9-0007iJ-IX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 13:14:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58946) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eXWVx-0007h6-JQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 13:14:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eXWVu-0004pQ-9d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 13:14:45 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:35797) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eXWVt-0004oy-Nf; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 13:14:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1329 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eXWVt-0004f0-6z; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 13:14:41 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Fri, 05 Jan 2018 11:12:38 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:221627 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2018 11:12:38 -0500 > > E.g. inserting either string into a buffer gives the same result (both > for unibyte and multibyte buffers), concatenating either of those > strings to a multibyte string gives the same result. Depends on which of the 2 representations of raw bytes is used, I think. See bug#29189.