From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#32406: Simplify explanation of interactive form Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2018 18:29:25 +0300 Message-ID: <83r2j7o8x6.fsf@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1533828487 21529 195.159.176.226 (9 Aug 2018 15:28:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 15:28:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 32406@debbugs.gnu.org To: Javier Olaechea Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 09 17:28:03 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fnmr4-0005TZ-Ve for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 17:28:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51538 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fnmtB-0004NP-J7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 11:30:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60506) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fnmt3-0004NJ-Jn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 11:30:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fnmt0-00009Y-Fa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 11:30:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41047) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fnmt0-00009P-Aq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 11:30:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fnmt0-0000FX-0K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 11:30:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2018 15:30:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32406 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 32406-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32406.1533828577891 (code B ref 32406); Thu, 09 Aug 2018 15:30:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 32406) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2018 15:29:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46065 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fnmsb-0000EJ-JB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 11:29:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41143) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fnmsZ-0000E4-P5 for 32406@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 11:29:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fnmsR-00087G-B5 for 32406@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 11:29:30 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:42015) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fnmsR-00087C-6i; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 11:29:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1602 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fnmsQ-0004wv-KI; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 11:29:27 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Javier Olaechea on Wed, 8 Aug 2018 22:46:55 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:149381 Archived-At: > From: Javier Olaechea > Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 22:46:55 -0500 > > The previous wording said that an interactive form is a declaration periphrastically ("Its presence serves as > flag"). I've done my best to follow the ChangeLog format As far as I could see, you just replaced "serves as a flag" with "is a declaration". Is that true? If so, can you explain why the proposed text is simpler? Thanks.