From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Algorithm in electric-pair--unbalanced-strings-p unsuitable for CC Mode Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 18:58:39 +0300 Message-ID: <83r277az4g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20190702131632.GA30597@ACM> <20190702160410.GB30597@ACM> <20190702182811.GC30597@ACM> <20190703105804.GA11238@ACM> <20190703133217.GC11238@ACM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="23342"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 03 18:02:36 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hihiN-0005w7-LE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 18:02:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37102 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hihiM-0008KS-E1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 12:02:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54662) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hihev-0006mQ-Cy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 11:59:03 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43622) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hiheo-0001e6-CJ; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 11:58:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4306 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hihek-0004EB-OL; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 11:58:53 -0400 In-reply-to: <20190703133217.GC11238@ACM> (message from Alan Mackenzie on Wed, 3 Jul 2019 13:32:17 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:238331 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 13:32:17 +0000 > From: Alan Mackenzie > Cc: João Távora , > emacs-devel > > > Even so, is calling 'git show fe06f64b' too hard to do? > > Yes. As you'll have noticed, this is an adversarial debate rather than > a constructive cooperation It is only an adversarial debate if you two make it so. I suggest to respond as if you don't perceive the adversarial aspects, and expect the other side to do the same. > Surely it is a matter of plain ettiquette It is not. Showing Git SHA is perfectly okay, at least in this list. > Besides, other people will read this post, and they'll have to remain > mystified, or put in the work themselves. Giving a cryptic, rather than > a meaningful, reference thus costs more time than it saves. That ship has sailed when we switched to Git. It is not wise, to say the least, to impregnate this discussion, which is already loaded with emotions, with yet another emotional reaction against something that no one can do anything about.