From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37641: major/minor tick faces bleed into empty lines at the end of buffer Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 11:51:29 +0300 Message-ID: <83r23ny60e.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83zhiczg1m.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="139702"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 37641@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 08 10:52:23 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHlEB-000aAd-VH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 10:52:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52370 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHlEA-00062N-MO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 04:52:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59205) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHlDz-00061m-N7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 04:52:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHlDt-0003oR-Uy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 04:52:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40668) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHlDt-0003oG-RW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 04:52:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHlDt-0001oj-OY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 04:52:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 08:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37641 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37641-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37641.15705247056958 (code B ref 37641); Tue, 08 Oct 2019 08:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37641) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2019 08:51:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49489 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHlDd-0001o8-Bn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 04:51:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50082) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHlDY-0001nt-DA for 37641@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 04:51:44 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38159) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHlDT-00036s-4R; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 04:51:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3084 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iHlDR-00079J-6b; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 04:51:33 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Juanma Barranquero on Tue, 8 Oct 2019 06:23:36 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:168616 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 06:23:36 +0200 > Cc: 37641@debbugs.gnu.org > > As an aside, if it is safe to assume that the faces are not going to change between digits of the line number, > perhaps this change would be a gain. What does "between digits" mean? While producing the glyphs for the digits of a single line number, no faces can change, because no Lisp is invoked. Is that what you meant? > It moves merging the tick faces outside the lnum_buf loop, and it is done only for the right line numbers and > when not beyond_zv. Yes, moving code out of the loop is a good idea.