From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39115: 26.3; eww consecutive links look like one link with mouse-over Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 21:23:40 +0200 Message-ID: <83r1zrthvn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86imlfxu7t.fsf@gmail.com> <87sgk7ttca.fsf@gnus.org> <837e1jv4fa.fsf@gnu.org> <8736c7qp4x.fsf@gmx.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="107328"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 39115@debbugs.gnu.org, ynyaaa@gmail.com To: Stephen Berman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 22 20:24:17 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iuLbs-000RsX-MG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 20:24:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46108 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iuLbr-0003Gc-5C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:24:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44431) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iuLbf-0003Fa-IK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:24:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iuLbe-0001bd-Ik for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:24:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45379) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iuLbe-0001bS-Fk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:24:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iuLbe-0005Wz-98 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:24:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 19:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39115 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 39115-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39115.157972102021233 (code B ref 39115); Wed, 22 Jan 2020 19:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39115) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jan 2020 19:23:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51352 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iuLbI-0005WP-GG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:23:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35244) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iuLbH-0005WD-5z for 39115@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:23:39 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43311) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iuLbB-0000t2-Nu; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:23:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4112 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iuLbA-0000VC-LW; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:23:33 -0500 In-reply-to: <8736c7qp4x.fsf@gmx.net> (message from Stephen Berman on Wed, 22 Jan 2020 20:15:10 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:175107 Archived-At: > From: Stephen Berman > Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , ynyaaa@gmail.com, > 39115@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 20:15:10 +0100 > > > Not without changes to C-level code, no. It currently traverses the > > glyphs looking for the first one that doesn't have the mouse-face, so > > if two stretches of text one after the other have that face, it won't > > notice. > > That appears to be so only if the respective face values of the > mouse-face properties have the same name; if the face names are > different, even if one inherits from the other so they are visually > indistinguishable, then each propertized string gets highlighted > independently when the mouse pointer hovers over it That goes without saying, but I thought the request was for the "normal" mouse face to be able to do that. It sounds a kludge to me to ask that each button uses a different value of mouse-face, since it means someone should construct each button by hand, and not generate them by generic code. But if using different face values is a good-enough solution, then sure, why not.