From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40001: tex-start-options-string not updated in texinfo.el Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 17:10:35 +0300 Message-ID: <83r1x81up0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83h7ys8iod.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="56571"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 40001@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Ernest N. Mamikonyan" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 31 16:11:32 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jJHc3-000Eci-EI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 16:11:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38702 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jJHc0-0002Fh-FU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:11:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48708) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jJHbb-0001f2-CV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:11:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJHba-0002AB-Eg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:11:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53408) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJHba-00029z-Az for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jJHba-00059v-4s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:11:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40001 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40001-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40001.158566383019768 (code B ref 40001); Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40001) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Mar 2020 14:10:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36721 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jJHb4-00058l-DX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:10:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33437) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jJHb2-00058N-Rr for 40001@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:10:29 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38890) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJHax-0001ff-75; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:10:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4564 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jJHaw-0003cE-1o; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:10:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Ernest.Mamikonyan@sig.com) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:177911 Archived-At: > From: "Ernest N. Mamikonyan" > Cc: <40001@debbugs.gnu.org> > Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:25:15 -0400 > > On Fri, Mar 13 2020, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Should we also bind tex-start-commands to some value (an empty > > string)? If not, why not? > > Sorry, not sure if you had a chance to look at the previous patch, based > on your suggestion. Do you agree with the approach? Yes, I will handle this soon. Thanks for the reminder.