From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks?
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 15:56:47 +0300
Message-ID: <83r1vl1hm8.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <b4q8jzniiuW8L3xmL0sPfIwqH6pZ8iqbIDANFXd3GZzQssHarca5H2IItSK3VaHPguM_OfilOaq6Yo0l3q3MCEJIUWg10c8BU3LhnTZLtyE=@protonmail.com>
 <m21rnpwd1x.fsf@gmail.com>
 <CALDnm52DN0buuF3xL7RsPjrfj-7iw1q9=qVidWbW8vXRv=2HAw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADwFkmmkvRdL_2harhO4hCiruQO561xRwuXtAeduiWPsFE=cVA@mail.gmail.com>
 <E1jZQqS-0007xS-MA@fencepost.gnu.org> <m27dxdzhq9.fsf@gmail.com>
 <83d07533e5.fsf@gnu.org> <m2d075xxr7.fsf@gmail.com>
 <83y2pt1lot.fsf@gnu.org> <m25zcxxvss.fsf@gmail.com>
 <83tv0h1kb0.fsf@gnu.org> <m2wo5dwg39.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202";
	logging-data="38439"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: joaotavora@gmail.com, eller.helmut@gmail.com, stefankangas@gmail.com,
 rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 15 15:21:55 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jZaHi-0009tn-CE
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 15:21:54 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41204 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jZaHh-0001Og-DX
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 09:21:53 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47218)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1jZZtm-0007do-CD
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 08:57:10 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40613)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1jZZtl-0004hd-0x; Fri, 15 May 2020 08:57:09 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3660 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1jZZtc-0002zU-NC; Fri, 15 May 2020 08:57:01 -0400
In-Reply-To: <m2wo5dwg39.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Robert Pluim on Fri, 15
 May 2020 14:14:02 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:250388
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/250388>

> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org,  eller.helmut@gmail.com,  stefankangas@gmail.com,
>   rms@gnu.org,  joaotavora@gmail.com
> Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 14:14:02 +0200
> 
>     Eli> Is that easy enough for users?  Maybe we should have a defcustom that
>     Eli> would set that up?
> 
> To replace the two that we have already?

No, to arrange those two to be set to those particular values.

> People who want to do this tend to be very technically capable, I
> donʼt see the need.

Let's see what Richard has to say about this, he is the user who'd
need to make these customizations for his use case.