From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39735: 27.0.60; bugs about XBM images Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 19:26:12 +0300 Message-ID: <83r1spauaj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86mu9apvc7.fsf@gmail.com> <875za1mogy.fsf@gnus.org> <835za1ceqe.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuxlglnw.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39668"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 39735@debbugs.gnu.org, ynyaaa@gmail.com To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 02 18:27:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k2GpM-000ADa-PI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 18:27:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60044 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2GpL-0004KU-S2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 12:27:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53584) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2GpD-0004K9-7K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 12:27:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59944) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2GpC-0005a3-51 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 12:27:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k2GpB-0004KI-TL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 12:27:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 16:27:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39735 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 39735-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39735.159638559516594 (code B ref 39735); Sun, 02 Aug 2020 16:27:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39735) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2020 16:26:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43257 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k2Gol-0004JZ-Hn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 12:26:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43352) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k2Goj-0004JM-PD for 39735@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 12:26:34 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52796) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2Goe-0005XJ-FS; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 12:26:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1151 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1k2God-0007z3-PR; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 12:26:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87tuxlglnw.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 02 Aug 2020 16:36:03 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:183862 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: ynyaaa@gmail.com, 39735@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 16:36:03 +0200 > > Since XBM is so obscure, we could just document that XBM just doesn't > support scaling, and that it's an error to give those parameters (unless > you really mean XBM dimensions). That'd be fine with me, yes. > But again, that also means that somebody that writes a loop of > `create-images' must be careful to not call it on XBM images... Yes, but given its obscurity, maybe this is not so bad?