From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#30692: list-buffers has hardwired 80 character width from the 80's Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 16:54:14 +0300 Message-ID: <83r1si7e9l.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87371gvjn9.fsf@jidanni.org> <87zi251tjd.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87604sn4dx.fsf@jidanni.org> <87lgdoej3f.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87pn826d5c.fsf@gnus.org> <83zh767k9o.fsf@gnu.org> <874kpe8yib.fsf@gnus.org> <83v9hu7j42.fsf@gnu.org> <87eeoi7inf.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14907"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: jidanni@jidanni.org, 30692@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 07 15:55:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k42py-0003lO-2b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 15:55:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53756 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k42px-000749-4m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 09:55:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58754) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k42pq-00073q-ED for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 09:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44672) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k42pq-00010j-2d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 09:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k42pq-0005WO-1H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 09:55:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 13:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30692 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 30692-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30692.159680846921063 (code B ref 30692); Fri, 07 Aug 2020 13:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 30692) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Aug 2020 13:54:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56217 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k42pI-0005Td-Ut for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 09:54:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48568) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k42pG-0005Sz-GX for 30692@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 09:54:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54020) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k42pA-0000xb-Rf; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 09:54:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4044 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1k42p9-0004lw-Ob; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 09:54:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87eeoi7inf.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 07 Aug 2020 14:19:32 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:184280 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: jidanni@jidanni.org, 30692@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 14:19:32 +0200 > > > So, as one makes the window wider, instead of using the additional > > space to display more of the file name, we will use it to display more > > of the buffer name? > > No, in my calculations above, we increase the width by 20 columns, and > give 5 to the buffer name and 15 to the file name. (Ish.) > > > Even if none of the buffer names is truncated? > > No, like I said in the first mail -- it won't be increased beyond the > length of the longest item in the buffer name column. SGTM, thanks.