From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [elpa] New package: vc-got
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 17:00:51 +0300
Message-ID: <83r1e9soh8.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87zgsx7v08.fsf@omarpolo.com> <83y28hsqtg.fsf@gnu.org>
 <ab1efc26-817a-49f6-e32a-109fbda2e18f@yandex.ru> <83tuj5spdi.fsf@gnu.org>
 <5f99f3b1-b1b9-20fa-df12-52eed3fedd3a@yandex.ru> <83sfypsp34.fsf@gnu.org>
 <fb5838a0-e2fd-451c-6022-a0fabbe360d3@yandex.ru>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="4790"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: timo.myyra@bittivirhe.fi, op@omarpolo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 31 16:06:49 2021
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1mL4PZ-000119-7y
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 16:06:49 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59352 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1mL4PY-0003RJ-8I
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 10:06:48 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59466)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1mL4K7-0004KN-TK
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 10:01:11 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36710)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1mL4K6-0003Zd-MO; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 10:01:10 -0400
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2800
 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1mL4Jv-0004D3-6R; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 10:01:03 -0400
In-Reply-To: <fb5838a0-e2fd-451c-6022-a0fabbe360d3@yandex.ru> (message from
 Dmitry Gutov on Tue, 31 Aug 2021 16:55:10 +0300)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273592
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/273592>

> Cc: op@omarpolo.com, timo.myyra@bittivirhe.fi, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 16:55:10 +0300
> 
> > So I'm asking if, for the same reason, it could make sense to have it
> > in core.
> 
> Aside from "why not?" not being a good reason, since 
> 2697123933e3ac7ed4e21a6d12746a98ed7fa74a vc-responsible-backend iterates 
> through all enabled backends when choosing the "current" one. So the 
> longer we make the list of built-in backends, the more overhead we get 
> on this.

How about keeping it out of vc-handled-backends, so that people who
want could replace Git with Got?