From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bidi-string-strip-control-characters Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 15:02:38 +0200 Message-ID: <83r192pnkh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ee52rcar.fsf@gnu.org> <8735li69hl.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmom1xdy.fsf@yahoo.com> <835yqer6w1.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8ye1wif.fsf@gnus.org> <8335lir69r.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtjq1sn7.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1677"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 20 19:00:08 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nAbjE-0000Fq-BQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 19:00:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36668 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAbjD-0003He-DE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 13:00:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48818) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAX5n-00025f-94 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 08:03:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=40640 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAX5Y-0006i1-Mc; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 08:03:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=/FZP1qDT4TTBqeE5OlgSamHUKaLIP8CKxFKfZjcdp/w=; b=fbPWlVLgHD/2 od0B8iaLjq+cZrVpTuhIRr05IvikrsB2KEsZIFZR/mZ3sCCSTBW0WkI3/mAHc6bWQzItJ73p3eHqN sri3VvENjG1AOc05PchEMnwR7aMg+GJdKSLfgOpW+kW1RxCQhtUvTxPDpvH8EnEpP1alxkmXQfaj/ 7qGHMXkw1wDufXCCKA1KxRyVgwGifK80Y5OPhAPv2Qdzsv27jyRZjGrfG9AbWzLonUw1P++2qkvS/ u2N7fCL549+wIOkJumyszhRVEWJiH1W0sXiOY+DDKiU2mGp98FUYs1/8fv/qJecYTzVheSPumPgrB NRHdyV1syJHl6l3jE6ZzJA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2475 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAX5M-0000Me-5h; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 08:02:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87mtjq1sn7.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 20 Jan 2022 13:46:52 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:285046 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 13:46:52 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > But what are we going to do with the function in the Subject? Is it > > still useful enough to have it, if we make that change? > > We're still using it in textsec-link-suspicious-p... How about if, instead of filtering out these controls, the function would replace them with their printed representation, like \u200e? Removing them might leave the user wondering what and where is wrong with the original text.