From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56682: locked narrowing Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 16:30:15 +0300 Message-ID: <83r11fc80o.fsf@gnu.org> References: <66bbbb95983414e79637@heytings.org> <83wnb9hadb.fsf@gnu.org> <395454dd-7238-c5d0-e924-2f65a186baa7@yandex.ru> <83r11hh4pm.fsf@gnu.org> <3a1232a17b09ce88af40@heytings.org> <83edxghqg2.fsf@gnu.org> <325f95fd2bcc0b666b0b@heytings.org> <83edxgfi75.fsf@gnu.org> <5e3c3081-f098-8140-c767-b895c32bf30b@yandex.ru> <835yisffil.fsf@gnu.org> <831qtgff78.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgg4dw4y.fsf@gnu.org> <83r11gdrr4.fsf@gnu.org> <83edxfds7s.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21530"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 56682@debbugs.gnu.org, gregory@heytings.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 17 15:31:34 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oOJ8v-0005TE-Ok for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 15:31:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38238 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOJ8u-0008T7-ML for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 09:31:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36920) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOJ8Q-0008SZ-Fr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 09:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60106) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOJ8Q-0008NE-6s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 09:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oOJ8Q-0001v0-3B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 09:31:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 13:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56682 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 56682-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56682.16607430387340 (code B ref 56682); Wed, 17 Aug 2022 13:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56682) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Aug 2022 13:30:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49855 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oOJ81-0001uH-Cz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 09:30:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51954) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oOJ7z-0001tw-0F for 56682@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 09:30:35 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39330) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOJ7s-0008GM-Nl; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 09:30:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=h4ilGpban0/c3aCOSY43KAn/xNPxsd1D3ae9hfFVbxo=; b=DlK+JsrADMeF nogDurTBEmHofidqqmZdN1UTUuNmad3S53zM1JFt5RDwcCOCGZUqzAATbkReDWP+Uc+W75CAA9u/6 /peMIWhQwmd1hmSzW2zbmU0ZaUOMSO5ddb5GgvcIoBCqeAytx+UdvNTSF/9XMu4HU91WqGqIPdoxK QeyyympYfyaSie2nrqCBFrhEbollS3PDl+lgDSzrV94lMLj4Hgqk1uujut0FFGO0McmZT0PcUs8wg 3WBh/pogm8vxgjPiQsyHiavpVt46b6gCOiCYfjiYXJvNnXu9aws9CEK1ArnTNddnlBUIbqKI6TUep Fi5ngRhE9E+pm6AOXp2Ikg==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3326 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOJ7o-0007ch-4f; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 09:30:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Wed, 17 Aug 2022 09:06:21 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:240076 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: dgutov@yandex.ru, 56682@debbugs.gnu.org, gregory@heytings.org > Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 09:06:21 -0400 > > > If a package wants to count lines in a function registered with > > jit-lock, I think it makes no sense for it to do that in Lisp. It > > would be much better to let such packages use the built-in > > capabilities that we use all the time, both on the mode line and under > > display-line-numbers mode. There are at least two advantages to that: > > (1) it will be at least slightly faster, sometimes more than slightly > > (due to caching); and (2) the problem of narrowing would be seamlessly > > resolved. > > FWIW, I agree. I don't think this information is cleanly&reliably > exposed to ELisp It isn't currently. I was suggesting to do so.