From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59381: Should xref--marker-ring be per-window? Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 20:22:26 +0200 Message-ID: <83r0xx4hb1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86leo6ai85.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83leo67mbt.fsf@gnu.org> <838rk66r17.fsf@gnu.org> <83y1s54jmj.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5063"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: juri@linkov.net, 59381@debbugs.gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Ackerley Tng Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 20 19:23:20 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1owoyM-00014E-Fm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 19:23:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1owoy9-0000Ed-NX; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 13:23:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1owoy7-0000E3-AT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 13:23:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1owoy6-0004vh-I3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 13:23:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1owoy6-0006IM-5F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 13:23:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 18:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59381 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59381-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59381.166896854524143 (code B ref 59381); Sun, 20 Nov 2022 18:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59381) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Nov 2022 18:22:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44597 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1owoxV-0006HL-1r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 13:22:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45972) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1owoxT-0006H7-1x for 59381@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 13:22:23 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1owoxN-0004tt-4p; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 13:22:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=gRsPdWzkZ5kMox6H2V5LxZSVs8+WAX9pJiUuKVY0fHE=; b=nEEYJafDvcF3 l+HqFsqTXamQPUmZyg1DbUqNnmxdx5vJe45oDWVPSyKp9oIdUvYuvTwwMni3Q1Mi7RSpCe0KNc2wz zlTo4I9CP6nB0AfiU/PQn3WwNtFZTIVfpG83nenaDiQONj8oj0HjxG2Sesrsbk9/Tk+L1RfBkAEjs +EUovVUDsXOl2hnsETyREiqw3sSmMUd4ww1zkXM1xsliEaNyPPwVzRjY9sdcCY8+r0ZTrOVNMku+8 TSyvDwabDNFjiIYF1jgS24ZtGFOT6H2z+CiCDZrKj9AhM7epUeIfsEVoNIaeGN1C4rPuUrNr+PdRn CBGG8rdqa/ZidS5mSqwD6g==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1owoxM-0002Tb-L2; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 13:22:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Ackerley Tng on Sun, 20 Nov 2022 10:11:30 -0800) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:248453 Archived-At: > From: Ackerley Tng > Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 10:11:30 -0800 > Cc: Dmitry Gutov , 59381@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net > > What does everyone think if we do the baseline of just creating a new > stack per-window (no copying) and then waiting to see if we get > feedback once people start using it? If this is optional and can be disabled, I don't think I mind.