From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com>
Cc: 62578@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#62578: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Add regression tests for synchronous processes in Eshell
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2023 10:22:22 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83r0t4yslt.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f2ba59be-61fe-d253-f560-6cb74f7f688a@gmail.com> (message from Jim Porter on Sat, 1 Apr 2023 00:16:38 -0700)
> Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2023 00:16:38 -0700
> Cc: 62578@debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com>
>
> Since these tests are meant to check the "synchronous subprocess" code
> in Eshell on non-MS-DOS platforms, I'd say it's ok. However, I can
> change my patch if you prefer. I could either:
>
> 1) Add a comment to the tests explaining that they're just meant to
> simulate some of MS-DOS's limitations on non-MS-DOS systems, or
>
> 2) Rework these tests so they work the same on both MS-DOS and other
> systems.
>
> Personally, I lean softly towards (1), partly because the Eshell test
> suite probably breaks in quite a few other places on MS-DOS anyway.
> However, it shouldn't be too hard to do (2) instead.
>
> What do you think?
I don't understand why not use Emacs instead of all those external
commands. That solves all the problems nicely and portably, and still
allows you to do anything you want.
But it's your call, eventually.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-01 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-01 4:41 bug#62578: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Add regression tests for synchronous processes in Eshell Jim Porter
2023-04-01 6:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-01 7:16 ` Jim Porter
2023-04-01 7:22 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2023-04-01 7:40 ` Jim Porter
2023-04-02 0:58 ` Jim Porter
2023-04-02 5:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-02 5:51 ` Jim Porter
2023-04-02 21:25 ` Jim Porter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83r0t4yslt.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=62578@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=jporterbugs@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.