From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 13:56:49 +0300 Message-ID: <83r0smg2a6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a5zj2vfo.fsf@gmail.com> <8335558qc7.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfd5761f.fsf@gnu.org> <87zg7djrgr.fsf@gmail.com> <83o7nt73za.fsf@gnu.org> <83mt3d73c2.fsf@gnu.org> <87r0sptinq.fsf@posteo.net> <83jzyh706c.fsf@gnu.org> <875ya1tdwf.fsf@posteo.net> <83edop6sdy.fsf@gnu.org> <831qkp6o0i.fsf@gnu.org> <83wn2h5825.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn2gkhzr.fsf@posteo.net> <83cz485oxi.fsf@gnu.org> <87leiwdyff.fsf@posteo.net> <87a5zblspg.fsf@posteo.net> <83ildz4vu7.fsf@gnu.org> <87mt3bk31e.fsf@posteo.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24152"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 14 12:58:17 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pnH8D-00066j-5S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:58:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnH80-0001bR-71; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 06:58:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnH7y-0001bJ-O8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 06:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnH7y-00017P-53 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 06:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pnH7x-0002HE-Nb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 06:58:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 10:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62720 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62720-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62720.16814698368698 (code B ref 62720); Fri, 14 Apr 2023 10:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Apr 2023 10:57:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45663 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pnH7D-0002GD-M0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 06:57:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40034) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pnH71-0002FX-LA for 62720@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 06:57:13 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnH6v-0000zh-3M; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 06:56:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=QmgjD2a7ByKjGy82QxYXHWV79KCm8jjQNC4yo/2/D0s=; b=TpFcoXLP2+Ai DCIhLkUW2BuvaegMmAfw2ifploJkIQoaeL8PacGjanZeaa0WpFqsKZlSMU8M6KvyVW0dKkLgNY+qu 1FIUQQUz4+P/haJI5b36VUTY6fNgLIEZAbADjh7MTFygOZBO4UGnK74E3TkBqomen++eiTQs4vaF8 uczh/3ie2hGFo3FtNqecZQgVwY4wyBRmeX+YEqPLWH19C2raVnh5SjpQM2481QY+k1VHj6jaU6sgt S4yalbwxM5Zdkd7iLyEeEr+Y8agYdLVOspo8Hlt18eWexDnLPHFO9xJoVa8ASBrdoc57/VIj3AUAn NikVCQNp8LbYKVpZ9n35FQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnH6o-00049l-VY; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 06:56:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87mt3bk31e.fsf@posteo.net> (message from Philip Kaludercic on Thu, 13 Apr 2023 19:14:37 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:259901 Archived-At: > From: Philip Kaludercic > Cc: joaotavora@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, > larsi@gnus.org > Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 19:14:37 +0000 > > > Are we still sure we want to change package-install, not > > package-upgrade? AFAIU, there were several voices that preferred the > > latter, with the rationale that a built-in package is always > > "installed", so "installing" it makes little or no sense. > > If you want that, here is one proposal. Should be the smallest so far: Hmm... looks identical to the previous patch you sent, which changes package-install? Or what am I missing? As for the question I asked: I'm okay with changing package-install if there are no objections from those who proposed to change package-upgrade instead.