From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:30:26 +0300 Message-ID: <83r0smdzxp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a5zj2vfo.fsf@gmail.com> <831qkp6o0i.fsf@gnu.org> <83wn2h5825.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn2gkhzr.fsf@posteo.net> <83cz485oxi.fsf@gnu.org> <87leiwdyff.fsf@posteo.net> <834jpk5hih.fsf@gnu.org> <871qkom3fj.fsf@posteo.net> <83mt3b4yfc.fsf@gnu.org> <87edonlsxi.fsf@posteo.net> <83jzyf4vzb.fsf@gnu.org> <871qknllkj.fsf@posteo.net> <83fs934pjf.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn2fk47y.fsf@posteo.net> <83sfd2g2ek.fsf@gnu.org> <875y9yfxrr.fsf@gmail.com> <87y1muefks.fsf@gmail.com> <834jpifizy.fsf@gnu.org> <83y1mue1qi.fsf@gnu.org> <55c24919-a707-28dd-811b-10db5317c271@gutov.dev> <83ttxie0fg.fsf@gnu.org> <08d2627c-a48b-80d2-fdaf-9e551db4a049@gutov.dev> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26670"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, rpluim@gmail.com, philipk@posteo.net, joaotavora@gmail.com, larsi@gnus.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 14 21:31:14 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pnP8c-0006lI-4C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 21:31:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnP8R-0003vU-0C; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 15:31:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnP8Q-0003vM-1F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 15:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnP8P-0002Xf-O4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 15:31:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pnP8P-00089I-Is for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 15:31:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 19:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62720 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62720-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62720.168150066031317 (code B ref 62720); Fri, 14 Apr 2023 19:31:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Apr 2023 19:31:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47746 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pnP8N-000892-PS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 15:31:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55058) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pnP8L-00088q-Ft for 62720@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 15:30:57 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnP8D-0002Tc-DR; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 15:30:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=bxCuPzRbGRxCsVaF9RGjI55kKztpMd714OeFttqOg7w=; b=ZPOXo7dstlmh J6j3OqnceiChr/FX1qtD0rENQh9aicUjR7so5glz9UxDhPghxlRGoiTJlZ3pZYeC5pHOK5m+ewZ2W FS0ctue4tcb4RFQiUpNnTQztBRguTvU/dXclCY+rSs96jnypw66WbOJsC7nqjntRL8Kzg6dZsmv7y DqmZ65WOLo9vcz6bhqT6i10v6qLmwL3OKBKNagFXe7amiKtpkCH9PB5nBMXfX+xt+p85cVrYRDHg5 jTIjWYUd24YCSnuUdseV7/RYXhxd3v0jWs89I1FHqvsfnWcaI86iJsv7XsbSB+pk17FjkQNcx95EU fcQu/1coRrdCumsT0iaGRw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnP82-0003Jj-0v; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 15:30:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <08d2627c-a48b-80d2-fdaf-9e551db4a049@gutov.dev> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:21:41 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:259970 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:21:41 +0300 > Cc: joaotavora@gmail.com, rpluim@gmail.com, philipk@posteo.net, > 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca > From: Dmitry Gutov > > On 14/04/2023 22:19, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > So Eglot 1.14 is not stable? Does Eglot has a stable branch on ELPA? > > All Eglot development is led on master. > > > I meant to include the latest stable release, not an unstable one. > > We consider tagged releases (ones that bump the version header) as > "stable" ones, and all intermediate commits as "unstable". Those are not > the same kind of "stable" as Emacs releases, obviously. So which version of Eglot is sufficiently "stable" to go with the stable version of Emacs?