From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr vs. git repository Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 13:44:51 +0200 Message-ID: <83pqsgq24s.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20110101.092838.211465745.wl@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1293882222 6699 80.91.229.12 (1 Jan 2011 11:43:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 11:43:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Werner LEMBERG Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 01 12:43:37 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PYzry-0005OW-Ln for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 12:43:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59700 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PYzry-0006bo-3R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 06:43:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44687 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PYzrm-0006bR-KB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 06:43:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PYzrl-0000Cw-BL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 06:43:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:46641) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PYzrl-0000CO-4t; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 06:43:21 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LEC00I00DRU9Y00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 13:42:42 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.219.104]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LEC00HYNDV5TU40@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 13:42:42 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <20110101.092838.211465745.wl@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:134105 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:28:38 +0100 (CET) > From: Werner LEMBERG > > bzr pull (bzr+ssh, bzr version 2.0.5): > > Update from > > revno: 102636 > committer: Glenn Morris > branch nick: trunk > timestamp: Fri 2010-12-10 18:54:07 -0800 > > to > > revno: 102734 > committer: Chong Yidong > branch nick: trunk > timestamp: Sat 2011-01-01 01:02:36 -0500 > > sent: 512k > received: 19357k FWIW, "bzr up" which brings only 26 of these 98 revisions on the trunk shows this network information in my .bzr.log file: Transferred: 5238kB (99.0kB/s r:5234kB w:3kB) and I never see the amount of bytes being sent by bzr anywhere close to 512kB, since we switched to bzr+ssh. It's always 3k to 4k, even though I generally update once a week. But perhaps that's due to the fact that bzr doesn't count the traffic accurately.