From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16433: 24.3.50; find_newline screws up in Rmail buffers Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:52:32 +0200 Message-ID: <83ppnt44zj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83r48b62ut.fsf@gnu.org> <837ga25uum.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389801198 14862 80.91.229.3 (15 Jan 2014 15:53:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:53:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16433@debbugs.gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 15 16:53:24 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W3SmL-000108-HY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 16:53:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55643 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3SmK-0003Op-Uy for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:53:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36594) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3SmC-0003OY-6z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:53:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3Sm6-0007XG-9S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:53:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38213) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3Sm6-0007XC-6C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:53:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W3Sm5-00052a-Uk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:53:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16433 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16433-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16433.138980116219345 (code B ref 16433); Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:53:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16433) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jan 2014 15:52:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52232 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W3Slm-00051x-5O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:52:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:39707) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W3Slj-00051l-AD for 16433@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:52:40 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MZG00G00999LD00@mtaout29.012.net.il> for 16433@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:53:30 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MZG00AU69H68F70@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:53:30 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:83537 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 07:29:05 -0500 > From: Richard Stallman > CC: 16433@debbugs.gnu.org > > To reproduce it at that time, do you happen to remember what sequence > of commands was needed? > > (mail-fetch-field "X-RMAIL-ATTRIBUTES") reproduced the bug, when it > was happening. Thanks. > If and when it happens again, please try to look for editing > operations that change buffer text (insert or delete characters), but > do not invalidate the cache for the region where characters were > inserted or deleted. > > I had not done any manual editing on the RMAIL buffer. > It was operated on by Rmail commands. If you see what editing > functions they call, you will see what I did to the RMAIL buffer. I meant editing operations that Rmail invokes behind the scenes, like when it displays a message in rmail-view-buffer. > It's possible I decrypted it with rmail-epa-decrypt. Thanks, I'll take a look at that. > If it isn't obvious what is wrong, we need to fix this bug somehow. I > am thinking of turning off the newline cache in Rmail mode. That'd sweep the problem under the carpet, so I don't recommend that, not yet anyway.