From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16694: Regression by commit 115663 (bzr): Theme face attributes no longer take precedence over X resources Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:07:48 +0200 Message-ID: <83ppmg4yvv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <52F601AE.5040309@binary-island.eu> <52FE6BD6.7090607@binary-island.eu> <83txbt4p37.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392973690 11624 80.91.229.3 (21 Feb 2014 09:08:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:08:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ml_emacs-lists@binary-island.eu, 16694@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 21 10:08:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WGm5g-0004na-Fb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:08:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43210 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WGm5f-0001GM-UM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 04:08:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56558) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WGm5Y-0001FU-5Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 04:08:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WGm5S-0008MT-Ha for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 04:08:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33078) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WGm5S-0008MP-E6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 04:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WGm5R-0003nQ-S7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 04:08:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16694 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16694-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16694.139297366314557 (code B ref 16694); Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16694) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2014 09:07:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34260 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WGm59-0003mi-0N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 04:07:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il ([80.179.55.183]:44523) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WGm55-0003mP-PO for 16694@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 04:07:41 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N1C00J008V60800@mtaout27.012.net.il> for 16694@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:05:48 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N1C00GV399O3S40@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:05:48 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85964 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Matthias Dahl , 16694@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:47:07 -0500 > > > Any reasons not to install this? Anybody? > > I don't understand this code nor the change that seems to have broken > it, so I neither support nor oppose the change. If no one objects in a couple of days, I think we should install it. > Does it fix bug#16378 as well? No.