From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Network security manager Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 18:22:01 +0200 Message-ID: <83ppclbxw6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wq6uj5gt.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k32tkh1x.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416241361 8705 80.91.229.3 (17 Nov 2014 16:22:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:22:41 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 17 17:22:34 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XqP4U-0000yH-Fx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:22:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48730 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqP4T-0003nv-Tk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:22:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51607) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqP4D-0003WT-5S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:22:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqP48-00060j-1k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:22:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il ([80.179.55.180]:60519) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqP47-00060S-Qz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:22:11 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NF600C00YEKJJ00@mtaout24.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 18:14:34 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NF600619YGAGV60@mtaout24.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 18:14:34 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87k32tkh1x.fsf@lifelogs.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.180 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177442 Archived-At: > From: Ted Zlatanov > Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:00:58 -0500 > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:17:19 -0500 Stefan Monnier wrote: > > SM> Indeed. I could consider including it in a 24.5 release because it's > SM> a somewhat important issue, but it would have to be "obviously safe" > SM> (in the sense of "won't break anything"). That sounds fairly unlikely. > > I don't know how complicated it will be internally, but I don't think it > will endanger any existing functionality (except TLS connections, of > course). Please consider possible bugs as well, not just the effect on workflows.