From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Network security manager Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 05:55:43 +0200 Message-ID: <83ppcj9740.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sihg7r73.fsf@alrua-karlstad.karlstad.toke.dk> <87a93oilxl.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87oas4h555.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87a93oh180.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83h9xw9zg3.fsf@gnu.org> <83d28k9yb9.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416369381 26168 80.91.229.3 (19 Nov 2014 03:56:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 03:56:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 19 04:56:14 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XqwNJ-0005E1-Bh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 04:56:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56390 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqwNJ-0003yS-30 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 22:56:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58043) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqwN0-0003yM-Pp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 22:55:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqwMv-0006Bh-Ku for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 22:55:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il ([80.179.55.180]:50878) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqwMv-0006Bb-Cb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 22:55:49 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NF900J00OD3ZG00@mtaout24.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 05:48:11 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NF900EFNP8BTD60@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 05:48:11 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.180 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177709 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:09:04 -0500 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > I also did some further testing with my patch, and apparently timers do > > not set the running_asynch_code variable? They probably should set > > that separate variable, too. I think. > > BTW, another existing variable that you could use is `inhibit-quit'. That's dangerous, IMO. Again, it uses a variable not designed for this functionality, IOW this could break without notice.