From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6130: 23.1; artist-mode spray-can malfunction Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 23:26:11 +0200 Message-ID: <83ppa5rxxo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8dd014e7478827e94e3a8fe5b2b948e0@lysator.liu.se> <54BA6A0A.4080408@gmx.at> <54BB8375.9000506@gmx.at> <54BFD9D9.70708@gmx.at> <54C1402D.1000100@gmx.at> <54C205D0.3000607@gmx.at> <83mw59u91v.fsf@gnu.org> <54C27CD2.1040402@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1422048436 3531 80.91.229.3 (23 Jan 2015 21:27:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 21:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6130@debbugs.gnu.org, busk@lysator.liu.se, dk@danielkoning.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 23 22:27:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YEll4-0008D3-TQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 22:27:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33214 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEll4-0000SK-9q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:27:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48896) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YElkx-0000S8-Dn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:27:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YElks-0000UG-TT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:27:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35946) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YElks-0000UC-Qs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:27:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YElks-0005GO-HF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:27:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 21:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6130 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6130-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6130.142204837820177 (code B ref 6130); Fri, 23 Jan 2015 21:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6130) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2015 21:26:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54638 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YElk9-0005FN-NY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:26:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:48998) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YElk7-0005F9-5S for 6130@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:26:16 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NIN00B00FB8JG00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 6130@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 23:26:08 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NIN00BF8FJKJI00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 23:26:08 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98656 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 6130@debbugs.gnu.org, busk@lysator.liu.se, dk@danielkoning.com > Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:05:33 -0500 > > >>> > It's wrong for posn-window to return a frame. > >> Can you explain why it's wrong? > > If you take a step back and read my sentence you'll see it's pretty > obvious: since it says "window" it shouldn't return a "frame". We do that all the time. For example: (display-graphic-p &optional DISPLAY) Return non-nil if DISPLAY is a graphic display. [...] DISPLAY can be a display name, a frame, or nil (meaning the selected frame's display). In polymorphic interfaces, the alternative is to say DISPLAY-OR-FRAME-OR-... which is too tedious.