From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: VC mode and git Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:15:31 +0200 Message-ID: <83pp7yp5po.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86egoeusg2.fsf@example.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1427224567 21010 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2015 19:16:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 19:16:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Sebastien Vauban Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 24 20:15:59 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YaUIu-0002fL-AW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:15:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34019 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaUIt-0005d5-IN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:15:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54770) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaUIm-0005cx-AZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:15:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaUIh-0001NS-5w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:15:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:44682) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaUIg-0001ND-Rl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:15:43 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NLQ00700D35M600@mtaout28.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:14:19 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NLQ003WIDFV8W50@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:14:19 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <86egoeusg2.fsf@example.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.184 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184175 Archived-At: > From: Sebastien Vauban > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:05:33 +0100 > > I think that the real conclusion of the discussion is: shouldn't vc-dir > have a command to push? And, to that, I guess most of us would answer > yes, right? A related question is: does "C-x v v" at all make sense with Git and other dVCSes? If it does, what would be the DWIM cycle there? E.g., would it make sense for "C-x v v" to push when the previous action was commit and there are not uncommitted changes?