From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Coordinates and Windows Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 19:15:35 +0300 Message-ID: <83pp3m4xg8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <55A60508.7090903@gmx.at> <83oajd79kz.fsf@gnu.org> <55A6A4A1.1030307@gmx.at> <83fv4p6wqp.fsf@gnu.org> <55A759D1.5090001@gmx.at> <83bnfc6um1.fsf@gnu.org> <55AC9D92.8060205@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1437408977 16134 80.91.229.3 (20 Jul 2015 16:16:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 16:16:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 20 18:16:09 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZHDjZ-0004L0-3V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 18:16:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56164 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZHDjY-0006yN-9r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 12:16:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58091) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZHDjL-0006y6-J5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 12:15:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZHDjF-0005GF-Tq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 12:15:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout25.012.net.il ([80.179.55.181]:40262) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZHDjF-0005FF-LJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 12:15:45 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout25.012.net.il by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NRS00900NN17T00@mtaout25.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 19:11:51 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NRS0094TNNR5P00@mtaout25.012.net.il>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 19:11:51 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <55AC9D92.8060205@gmx.at> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:188013 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:04:50 +0200 > From: martin rudalics > CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > (And they are not pseudo-windows, btw; they are full-fledged windows, > > they just display stuff that comes from strings generated by the > > display engine, not from some buffer.) > > If they are not pseudo-windows then why do they have the pseudo_window_p > flag get set in adjust_frame_glyphs_for_window_redisplay? I guess I misunderstood what you meant by "pseudo-windows". If you meant that flag, then yes, they are; but as you know, that flag is used for variety of indications, like to avoid drawing the fringes and the cursor in these windows, so "pseudo" here is a kind of misnomer, IMO.