From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21333: 25.0.50; window-size-change-functions not called after mini-window resize Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 18:32:14 +0300 Message-ID: <83pp2a5am9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83k2skhhz1.fsf@gnu.org> <83twrofr0u.fsf@gnu.org> <55DC185A.4080101@gmx.at> <83oahvfllk.fsf@gnu.org> <55DD663C.4040504@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1440603233 25697 80.91.229.3 (26 Aug 2015 15:33:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:33:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: pipcet@gmail.com, 21333@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 26 17:33:41 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUchl-0000XG-NW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 17:33:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38866 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUchk-0006pX-Tb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:33:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52109) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUchG-0006Kj-7y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:33:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUchC-0007UH-SS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:33:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46724) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUchC-0007U7-Q8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUchC-0007G5-IX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21333 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21333-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21333.144060314027848 (code B ref 21333); Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21333) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Aug 2015 15:32:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38934 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUcgV-0007F6-Ku for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:32:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:44893) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUcgS-0007Ew-QL for 21333@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:32:17 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NTP009004BXLU00@mtaout29.012.net.il> for 21333@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 18:32:25 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NTP0048C4I1CB60@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 18:32:25 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <55DD663C.4040504@gmx.at> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:105836 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 09:09:48 +0200 > From: martin rudalics > CC: pipcet@gmail.com, 21333@debbugs.gnu.org > > > And we get regular complaints about that as well. Moreover, the > > setting of the modified status by fill-paragraph is just an annoyance > > that doesn't cost anyone any extra complexity, whereas the situation > > with this and similar hooks costs us quite a lot in that aspect. > > But you don't worry about performance anyway. I said "complexity". A hook function for a hook that calls you indiscriminately can be very cheap performance-wise, but its complexity could be overwhelming, and the result could easily be fragile. > OTOH for the person who writes the function on the hook it might > hardly matter whether some window size really changed. The more > important case might be to not miss one single case where the size > really changes. Inaccurate hooks make this task very hard and prone to breakage with each new release.