From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lax matching is not a great default behavior Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2015 10:02:10 +0200 Message-ID: <83poylfhml.fsf@gnu.org> References: <837fl2qzs2.fsf@gnu.org> <83610ikvto.fsf@gnu.org> <83bna6ipn7.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpsuh6cr.fsf@gnu.org> <83mvtqgtrl.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449302619 8156 80.91.229.3 (5 Dec 2015 08:03:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 08:03:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jwiegley@gmail.com, per@starback.se, rms@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: John Wiegley Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 05 09:03:28 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a57oU-0001T6-IE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 09:03:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44876 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a57oT-00024W-LO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 03:03:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51639) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a57oP-00020W-DO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 03:03:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a57oM-0007yS-8C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 03:03:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:35275) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a57oM-0007yL-0C; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 03:03:18 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NYV00J00KW5PM00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 10:02:20 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NYV00JKRKZWMX30@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 10:02:20 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:195916 Archived-At: > From: John Wiegley > Cc: Per Starb=E4ck , jwiegley@gmail.com, > rms@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 10:47:14 -0700 >=20 > >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: >=20 > > For now, the release is still so far away that any difference bet= ween these > > 2 alternatives is indiscernible, IMO. >=20 > Let's not assume that the next release is quite that far away. I w= ould like > to see it completed by June 2016, if that is possible. Yes. I think I said 6 months elsewhere, so there's no contradiction.