From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Questions about isearch Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:04:48 +0200 Message-ID: <83povf8pun.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83lh9lx6oi.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8q1x1cn.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9k74pkw.fsf@gmail.com> <83bnafse4f.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3fwaktc.fsf@gnu.org> <83h9gsaf2p.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456761932 7994 80.91.229.3 (29 Feb 2016 16:05:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 16:05:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: per.starback@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, bruce.connor.am@gmail.com, mathias.dahl@gmail.com To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 29 17:05:31 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aaQKB-000446-QO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 17:05:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37444 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aaQKB-0006yL-4H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:05:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41482) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aaQJw-0006y6-Ug for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:05:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aaQJs-0006MA-Ud for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:05:16 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:32919) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aaQJs-0006M6-Ra; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:05:12 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4731 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aaQJh-0008Fu-5O; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:05:01 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Mon, 29 Feb 2016 08:32:05 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:200816 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > CC: mathias.dahl@gmail.com, per.starback@gmail.com, > bruce.connor.am@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 08:32:05 -0500 > > > > Much better, of course, would be a poll among users. Since I came late to > > > this discussion I don't know if such a poll was done. > > > The discussions were right here, you can simply read them (provided > > that you have enough time ;-): > > A discussion here is the first step, but not a substitute for a poll > of users. That discussion is the closest approximation to a poll we had, so reading it should probably be useful for someone who missed it.