From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Ibuffer: w and B default to buffer at current line Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 17:29:08 +0300 Message-ID: <83poo1i8nf.fsf@gnu.org> References: << >>> <<<83intw5our.fsf@gnu.org>> <3dbc0c03-56f9-4b6f-bd3b-258458967665@default> >> <<<83zin630i9.fsf@gnu.org>> <024f1fd0-80ee-4780-bebb-c935959851bc@default>> <<83vaxuib1p.fsf@gnu.org>> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474208994 21662 195.159.176.226 (18 Sep 2016 14:29:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 14:29:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jwiegley@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, tino.calancha@gmail.com To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 18 16:29:49 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bld6D-0003vg-N9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 16:29:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50308 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bld6C-0003MO-2j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 10:29:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39744) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bld5b-0003M8-T3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 10:29:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bld5W-0001ft-Pz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 10:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49052) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bld5W-0001fR-No; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 10:28:58 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2915 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bld5U-0006fa-S6; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 10:28:58 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Drew Adams on Sat, 17 Sep 2016 12:33:27 -0700 (PDT)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207548 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 12:33:27 -0700 (PDT) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: jwiegley@gmail.com, tino.calancha@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > > Yes, of course. But as I pointed out, the case at hand has > > > nothing to do with DWIM. > > > > I disagree. > > And your reason is? > > A user _explicitly specifies_ which to use, of the behaviors > the command supports. How is that guess-what-I-mean-and-do-it? See what John wrote. The issue at hand is broader than what you interpreted it to be.