From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24764: 25.1.50; Another crash in automatic gc Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:06:00 +0300 Message-ID: <83pomrnuc7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87vawkk9l1.fsf@web.de> <83d1isr94u.fsf@gnu.org> <87vawkboh0.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83a8dwr3sa.fsf@gnu.org> <838ttgr2u6.fsf@gnu.org> <87insk4gye.fsf@web.de> <8360okqxtm.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8dw4f6t.fsf@web.de> <83zilwpgkv.fsf@gnu.org> <87zilw2qc2.fsf@web.de> <83oa2cp6yi.fsf@gnu.org> <87insjjuxv.fsf@web.de> <83twc3o1fl.fsf@gnu.org> <83shrnnz4s.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpgzl4k3.fsf@web.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477224446 4298 195.159.176.226 (23 Oct 2016 12:07:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:07:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 24764@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 23 14:07:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1byHYY-000882-GI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 14:07:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40886 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byHYa-0006cu-Oc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 08:07:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42753) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byHYR-0006cd-1d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 08:07:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byHYM-0001iZ-GO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 08:07:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60815) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byHYM-0001iG-DH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 08:07:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1byHYM-0002OM-7k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 08:07:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24764 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24764-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24764.14772243759138 (code B ref 24764); Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:07:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24764) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Oct 2016 12:06:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47980 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1byHXb-0002NJ-G9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 08:06:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51663) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1byHXZ-0002N7-Hc for 24764@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 08:06:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byHXR-0001aW-64 for 24764@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 08:06:08 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:60958) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byHXR-0001aS-2m; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 08:06:05 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2642 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1byHXQ-00016W-Do; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 08:06:04 -0400 In-reply-to: <87wpgzl4k3.fsf@web.de> (message from Michael Heerdegen on Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:53:32 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:124892 Archived-At: > From: Michael Heerdegen > Cc: 24764@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:53:32 +0200 > > > That could mean that previously you didn't use ralloc.c, whereas now > > you do. > > Is it worth to try to downgrade libc stuff to stable? Yes, I think so: that could tell us if using ralloc.c is the trigger of these problems. Does downgrading allow you to have both versions of libc installed and usable at the same time? If so, try to keep the problematic version of Emacs as well, for comparison. Thanks.