From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24091: 24.5; High CPU usage at startup while hidden Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 09:52:23 +0200 Message-ID: <83pojqaxjc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <24533f31-9fc2-b38e-aaeb-561616cdf77f@gmail.com> <87shut9pyk.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83lh0lq9n5.fsf@gnu.org> <83oa5fp1zb.fsf@gnu.org> <877fbkw7b1.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83inv1fnf9.fsf@gnu.org> <83zinodghv.fsf@gnu.org> <83y438de6m.fsf@gnu.org> <57CBCE4F.5040705@gmx.at> <57CC1E5F.8010107@gmx.at> <57CC4435.7040503@gmx.at> <838tv5au9g.fsf@gnu.org> <87shons1mf.fsf@gmail.com> <87a8auzait.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1484380396 24620 195.159.176.226 (14 Jan 2017 07:53:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 07:53:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dominik.schrempf@gmail.com, acairncross@gmail.com, clement.pit@gmail.com, 24091@debbugs.gnu.org To: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, Ken Raeburn Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 14 08:53:08 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cSJ98-0005Oq-Hm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 08:53:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46881 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSJ9C-00024Z-SH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 02:53:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43098) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSJ97-00024T-8V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 02:53:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSJ94-0007MZ-75 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 02:53:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37897) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSJ94-0007MV-3V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 02:53:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cSJ93-00027n-TP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 02:53:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 07:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24091 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed patch Original-Received: via spool by 24091-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24091.14843803538133 (code B ref 24091); Sat, 14 Jan 2017 07:53:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24091) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jan 2017 07:52:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53296 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cSJ8a-000276-TX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 02:52:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52038) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cSJ8Z-00026u-A1 for 24091@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 02:52:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSJ8T-0007G4-9M for 24091@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 02:52:25 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:51982) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSJ8O-0007CM-9x; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 02:52:20 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4430 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cSJ8I-00042a-Nf; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 02:52:15 -0500 In-reply-to: <87a8auzait.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> (npostavs@users.sourceforge.net) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:128110 Archived-At: > From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 24091@debbugs.gnu.org, acairncross@gmail.com, clement.pit@gmail.com > Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 20:38:02 -0500 > > We left things inconclusive, but revisiting this now, I see no reason > against simply removing this waiting loop: Are you saying that the loop has no purpose at all? If it does, what will happen with the code which needs that loop? E.g., AFAIK some stuff is impossible to do without the frame actually being shown on display. But maybe I'm wrong. Ken, can you comment on this, please?