From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Andreas Politz <politza@hochschule-trier.de>
Cc: 26126@debbugs.gnu.org, michael.albinus@gmx.de
Subject: bug#26126: 26.0.50; file-notify-rm-watch removes arbitrary watches
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 17:17:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83poh5bfuh.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a889hgxb.fsf@luca> (message from Andreas Politz on Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:57:52 +0100)
> From: Andreas Politz <politza@hochschule-trier.de>
> Cc: michael.albinus@gmx.de, 26126@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:57:52 +0100
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > Thanks, but I have difficulty reading it. Could you please provide a
> > short legend?
>
> Sorry, I forgot to do that.
>
> The first column is the name of the test. The 2nd lists all watched
> entities mapped to symbolic names. Further columns list the events for
> specific back ends, which may refer to the same names.
That still leaves a lot of unclear entries there. maybe it isn't
important.
> >> Finally, I'm tempted to suggest to get rid of the flags argument of
> >> file-notify-add-watch.
>
> > The flags are there for the operations where the differences matter.
>
> When does it matter ?
Why should we care? That's for the programmer to decide; we just give
them the tools.
> Also: I think in the end we want to add a layer above filenotify.el,
> with the added ability of multiplexing events in a directory to multiple
> watches, watching files in that directory.
That was the original plan, AFAIR, but this facility still has too few
users to try abstracting that higher layer, IMO.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-25 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-16 14:14 bug#26126: 26.0.50; file-notify-rm-watch removes arbitrary watches Andreas Politz
2017-03-17 14:41 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-17 14:59 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-17 16:08 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-17 17:45 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-18 8:30 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-18 13:32 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-18 19:36 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-18 20:37 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-19 9:39 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-19 11:14 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-19 19:23 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-20 20:39 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-21 8:44 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-21 15:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-21 18:59 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-22 13:23 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-22 15:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-22 16:01 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-22 16:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-22 16:23 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-24 19:54 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 12:50 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-25 13:59 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 14:08 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-25 16:27 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 16:37 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-25 17:12 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 18:36 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-25 19:34 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-26 7:08 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-21 15:56 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-22 12:56 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-22 17:34 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-22 18:49 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-19 22:05 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-21 13:05 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-21 15:06 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-21 15:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-22 13:17 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-22 17:43 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-22 18:57 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-22 20:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-23 7:36 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-23 15:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-23 16:10 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-22 19:40 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-24 20:44 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 6:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-25 8:57 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 14:17 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2017-03-25 16:34 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 14:04 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-25 16:19 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 17:09 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-25 17:26 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 18:18 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 18:40 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-25 16:21 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-18 19:28 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-18 19:49 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-18 20:48 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-30 18:15 ` Paul Eggert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83poh5bfuh.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=26126@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=michael.albinus@gmx.de \
--cc=politza@hochschule-trier.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.