From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
Cc: m.sujith@gmail.com, 30182@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#30182: Update
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:32:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83po5rh3pu.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5A702D36.6040302@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Tue, 30 Jan 2018 09:30:46 +0100)
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 09:30:46 +0100
> From: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
> CC: m.sujith@gmail.com, 30182@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> > Ideas for how this could happen are welcome.
>
> The problem should be with calling pos_visible_p. It's obviously not
> a good idea to calculate the height of the mode line while trying to
> establish the tooltip text for a part of the mode line. So we
> probably end up evaluating `mode-line-buffer-identification' which
> sets up a timer.
I can believe that pos_visible_p might trigger the :eval form, and
that could add a timer. But what I cannot understand is how could
pos_visible_p be called between the first and the second call to
Flength inside concat. This is what we are trying to explain: how
come the first call returns 4, while the second one retuens 5. That
could only be explained by something that happened between these 2
calls.
> Unfortunately, this remains a wild guess. It's virtually impossible
> to analyze the problem in more depth: You'd always want the value of
> `timer-list' in order to know which timers have been added to and
> removed from it.
How about running the code with a watchpoint on Vtimer_alist? Could
that help?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-30 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-20 6:26 bug#30182: 27.0.50; Crash when doing mouse-over on modeline Sujith
2018-01-20 6:28 ` bug#30182: Update Sujith
2018-01-20 10:35 ` martin rudalics
2018-01-20 10:45 ` Sujith
2018-01-20 14:12 ` martin rudalics
2018-01-20 15:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-21 2:15 ` Sujith
2018-01-21 3:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-21 3:55 ` Sujith
2018-01-21 16:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-21 18:29 ` Sujith
2018-01-22 9:15 ` martin rudalics
2018-01-22 15:09 ` Sujith
2018-01-22 17:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-22 18:59 ` martin rudalics
2018-01-22 20:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-23 18:44 ` martin rudalics
2018-01-23 19:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-24 8:39 ` martin rudalics
2018-01-23 2:49 ` Sujith
2018-01-23 16:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-23 17:07 ` Sujith
2018-01-23 17:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-23 18:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-23 18:45 ` martin rudalics
2018-01-23 19:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-24 8:38 ` martin rudalics
2018-01-24 19:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-24 20:05 ` martin rudalics
2018-01-23 18:44 ` martin rudalics
2018-01-23 19:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-24 8:39 ` martin rudalics
2018-01-24 19:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-24 20:06 ` martin rudalics
2018-01-27 8:26 ` martin rudalics
2018-01-28 0:53 ` Sujith
2018-01-28 8:26 ` martin rudalics
2018-01-29 5:13 ` Sujith
2018-01-29 10:04 ` martin rudalics
2018-01-29 15:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-30 8:30 ` martin rudalics
2018-01-30 13:32 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2018-01-31 9:31 ` martin rudalics
2018-01-31 14:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-02-01 2:29 ` Sujith
2018-02-01 9:26 ` martin rudalics
2018-02-01 17:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-02-02 8:28 ` martin rudalics
2018-02-02 8:37 ` martin rudalics
2018-02-02 16:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-02-03 9:03 ` martin rudalics
2018-02-03 10:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-02-04 10:01 ` martin rudalics
2018-02-04 18:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-02-06 9:28 ` martin rudalics
2018-02-10 9:47 ` martin rudalics
2018-02-02 14:14 ` Noam Postavsky
2018-02-02 16:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-02-03 9:04 ` martin rudalics
2018-02-03 10:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-02-04 10:01 ` martin rudalics
2018-02-04 18:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-29 15:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-30 8:30 ` martin rudalics
2018-01-30 13:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-31 9:31 ` martin rudalics
2018-01-31 14:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-21 18:37 ` Sujith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83po5rh3pu.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=30182@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=m.sujith@gmail.com \
--cc=rudalics@gmx.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.