From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34678: 26.1; (elisp) `Minor Mode Conventions' Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 21:56:15 +0200 Message-ID: <83pnrdj99c.fsf@gnu.org> References: <> <<54960e92-89bb-40b1-ba82-1dbd7ff21b03@default>> <<83r2btjazx.fsf@gnu.org>> <7d09ffca-fcce-425f-b271-012842276714@default> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="116526"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 34678@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 27 20:57:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gz5KK-000UCa-Uv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 20:57:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49926 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gz5KJ-00024C-LN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:57:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58547) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gz5KB-00023E-Ld for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:57:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gz5KA-0001C9-Ry for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:57:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40852) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gz5K9-0001AD-SV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:57:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gz5K9-0003Jb-Ky for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:57:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 19:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34678 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34678-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34678.155129740812721 (code B ref 34678); Wed, 27 Feb 2019 19:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34678) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2019 19:56:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54396 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gz5Ju-0003J6-Mj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:56:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44098) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gz5Jt-0003Iu-3n for 34678@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:56:45 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54617) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gz5Jh-0000qH-L5; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:56:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3121 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gz5JV-0007SU-TY; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:56:30 -0500 In-reply-to: <7d09ffca-fcce-425f-b271-012842276714@default> (message from Drew Adams on Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:22:40 -0800 (PST)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:155877 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:22:40 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: 34678@debbugs.gnu.org > > > I don't see why: cross-references don't have to be symmetrical. > > Did someone say that cross-references have to be > symmetrical? > > > We refer to another node for details of something mentioned in passage, > > but that other node doesn't have to provide a cross-reference back. > > Did someone say that it had to? You went a long way towards saying that, yes. How else to interpret your amplification of the original report?