From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Branch freezing for release (WAS: bug#34776) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 19:40:58 +0300 Message-ID: <83pnpt6cf9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <871s3jeh8m.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87zhq4zzcz.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <871s3a90qo.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87imvmbube.fsf@gmail.com> <87mukyiczg.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <877ec2iau1.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <4CAA6D9F-0402-489C-8DD1-CE2ADBAA42C9@gnu.org> <87tvf69r16.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <4C62647A-5A71-4C82-9D37-ED933023AFC0@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="133678"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: eric@ericabrahamsen.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 10 18:42:21 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hEGIh-000YUD-8o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 18:42:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34486 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEGIg-0000ha-8R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:42:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46821) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEGHT-0008Og-Mj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:41:00 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37171) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEGHT-000784-0s; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:40:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2397 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hEGHS-0002wW-Cx; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:40:58 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Noam Postavsky on Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:16:35 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:235227 Archived-At: > From: Noam Postavsky > Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:16:35 -0400 > Cc: Emacs developers , Eric Abrahamsen > > > > I don't see anything there about not pushing after an RC is made > > > There's no need to say anything else, since an RC should be tarred after all its changes are pushed and tagged. That didn't happen this time by omission. We all make mistakes at times. > > Ah, I had initially thought you meant the unfortunate mistake was on > part of the person/people pushing to emacs-26 after the RC. If just one of these two things happened -- either they asked whether it was okay to push, or the RC was pushed and tagged -- we'd be okay, but none of them happened.