From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Line height issues with display-line-number-mode Date: Wed, 08 May 2019 20:30:24 +0300 Message-ID: <83pnoshn0v.fsf@gnu.org> References: <6fd496f0-7dd5-6c0e-5121-b618e7dca831@gmail.com> <83sgtqi02k.fsf@gnu.org> <83r29ahyz2.fsf@gnu.org> <83pnouhwxs.fsf@gnu.org> <83ef59igzc.fsf@gnu.org> <83tve5ghyd.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="59919"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 08 19:30:58 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hOQP7-000FIO-GF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 May 2019 19:30:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40829 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOQP6-00027Q-D5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 May 2019 13:30:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39908) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOQOs-00024S-6j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 May 2019 13:30:39 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55057) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOQOr-0001AT-Rr; Wed, 08 May 2019 13:30:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1284 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hOQOq-0006O5-MB; Wed, 08 May 2019 13:30:37 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Wed, 08 May 2019 10:17:38 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236302 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Wed, 08 May 2019 10:17:38 -0400 > > >> > Btw, any reasons (other than "because we can") why we use these > >> > tricks, instead of actually producing an underline? > >> Not sure what "producing an underline" means concretely. > > Using the 'underline' face, obviously. > > I did guess this part ;-) > But what text would you apply it to? See Noam's proposal, for example. > >> AFAICT they wouldn't appear any smaller than when line-numbers are > >> turned off, or would they? > > They might, I'm not sure. > > If it makes them smaller than without line-numbers, then it's indeed > a problem, but I wonder why/when that would happen. There are too many use cases related to display, I simply cannot be sure I remember (or even know) all of them. Maybe you are right, and I'm haunted by a problem that doesn't exist.