From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37324: Small typo in Emacs manual (frame parameters) Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 05:35:10 +0300 Message-ID: <83pnkb4ish.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83woel5m2n.fsf@gnu.org> <0e607c48-e932-593d-b603-56a102fd4926@gmail.com> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="97938"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 37324@debbugs.gnu.org To: Sebastian Urban Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 08 04:36:16 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i6n3n-000PM2-QD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2019 04:36:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46648 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i6n3m-0001Cn-Lg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 22:36:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40106) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i6n3a-0001Av-VG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 22:36:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i6n3a-0004CM-3y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 22:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57700) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i6n3Z-0004CE-Uf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 22:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i6n3Z-0001g8-QN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 22:36:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 02:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37324 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37324-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37324.15679101156398 (code B ref 37324); Sun, 08 Sep 2019 02:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37324) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Sep 2019 02:35:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38288 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i6n2p-0001f8-0x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 22:35:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59754) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i6n2n-0001eq-UJ for 37324@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 22:35:14 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41338) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i6n2i-0003u7-Es; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 22:35:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3378 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1i6n2h-0005wv-Ll; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 22:35:08 -0400 In-reply-to: <0e607c48-e932-593d-b603-56a102fd4926@gmail.com> (message from Sebastian Urban on Sat, 7 Sep 2019 21:14:31 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:166292 Archived-At: > From: Sebastian Urban > Cc: 37324@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2019 21:14:31 +0200 > > >> I think there is one unnecessary "space". > > > > That's on purpose: the example tries to align this line with the > > next. > > Ok, so I'm guessing that the number of spaces - in this example - > before and after the dot is insignificant from perspective of the code > (well, perhaps 1 is needed). But... is changing the insides of the > code example just to align it to the next line is reasonable? If > everywhere (I think) there is PARAMETER-ONE_SPACE-DOT-ONE_SPACE-VALUE > perhaps it would be better to stick to that, because otherwise someone > may think that there is an error in the code example. I don't see anything unreasonable in that example. Whitespace is insignificant in cons cells (and in many other places in Lisp).