From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37930: 26.3; Elisp manual: please remove index entry `seq library' Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 19:10:00 +0300 Message-ID: <83pnijtrmv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <<<5034f118-77b6-4f94-8d7b-2be7fd8f5195@default>>> <<<834kzwvutf.fsf@gnu.org>>> <<80c877d4-178e-479b-bc12-048aefbb433f@default>> <<83sgnftuan.fsf@gnu.org>> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="250626"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 37930@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 26 18:11:14 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iOOen-001347-VX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 18:11:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40662 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iOOel-00017I-S3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 12:11:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58191) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iOOee-0000xB-IN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 12:11:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iOOed-00031P-FA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 12:11:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60794) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iOOed-00031E-Bg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 12:11:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iOOed-0001l7-4b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 12:11:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 16:11:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37930 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 37930-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37930.15721062246709 (code B ref 37930); Sat, 26 Oct 2019 16:11:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37930) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Oct 2019 16:10:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41382 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iOOe0-0001k9-Bk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 12:10:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48964) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iOOdx-0001jp-9j for 37930@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 12:10:21 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42776) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iOOdr-0002cK-Vo; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 12:10:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2446 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iOOdq-0004v7-7S; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 12:10:15 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Drew Adams on Sat, 26 Oct 2019 08:55:11 -0700 (PDT)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:170212 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 08:55:11 -0700 (PDT) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: 37930@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > You disagree that `seq library' doesn't belong. > > > Fair enough. Why do you think it belongs? > > > > That's a wrong question, when talking about index entries. the > > important question is "is it useful?" > > Fair enough. Read it that way then, if you > want to quibble. "Quibble", thanks a lot. > To me, it doesn't belong - it shouldn't be > present, because I don't see it as especially > useful. But I'll be glad to learn how it is. How else do you get to functions from that library in the manual? > > Not obvious to you doesn't mean you should file a bug report, or that > > we should continue discussing this. > > I should file a bug report when I think it can > help improve Emacs. And that's what I do. > > Please don't tell others when or whether they > _should_ file bug reports. Your bug report was considered and rejected. Why do you continue arguing instead of accepting the decision? This is a recurring pattern with you, and one that makes it so unnecessarily hard handling your bug reports. People avoid responding to your bug reports because of that. I myself sometimes avoid them. This is unnecessary, and actually harms Emacs. Please consider not arguing about decisions to close your bug reports. > You can close any report that you don't think is helpful. I already did. But it doesn't seem to help, not with bugs filed by you.