From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Request: Please add a prompt to read-event Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 17:00:28 +0200 Message-ID: <83pmpim6sz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o85exsyv.fsf@gnus.org> <871r1yckri.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22169"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: raman@google.com, stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 27 16:02:37 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n1rWH-0005Xp-95 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 16:02:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53766 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1rWF-0007MT-VZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 10:02:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35964) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1rUG-00059U-9X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 10:00:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=58024 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1rUE-0000YV-Mn; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 10:00:31 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=CpveSTvLedmRF1v+XyrRUYOzNxIdDL+gpl4jIpLxeCc=; b=dWbClaWCeZ7M piepynUFEbrgYyVZZf/VyW0rkOSzShIYQg6CJzEoFNetK3BgJsOiwAx4RXjXPjRlOXziPLAq1R4wL 3bcdXPSG6C85Lqfu8qCLdnZUfkmMMFq++UP5kKOFscAlcLKnMqZ/e+TmVWleVlfzMoiVirVScjCkU fsnVl6xEOnA1lCNRM7WSm8ejiM3z1m6tHdU6KfjCqJOPyz7rMGvSR3cjyZ2f5wor4ZOQB/ZeP2d18 /qysgJrW+6bRMXa7i9E0lqeOWXJfcb8E6o1vTyRghKgFVCJh6EkkVyWW9MP12zorLV4edBrxRiNJc qIdaB6VSQXp+R4yEiToIjA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3084 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1rUE-0006Pw-QE; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 10:00:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <871r1yckri.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Mon, 27 Dec 2021 13:09:05 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:283434 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 13:09:05 +0100 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, "TV. Raman" > > Stefan Kangas writes: > > > I think we could cherry-pick Lars' fix, as it is small enough. That > > change is enough to resolve the issue for emacspeak users, right? > > This code has basically been this way since 1989, so it can't be called > a regression. So even if it looks like a small change, I don't think it > should be backported to the release branch at this time. I agree.