From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59602: 29.0.50; csharp-mode should either be a package, or compat code could be removed Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 08:04:07 +0200 Message-ID: <83pmd9q6g8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o7st4jid.fsf@thornhill.no> <495b9dec-013f-5248-8a57-5539f16575d7@secure.kjonigsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8371"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 59602@debbugs.gnu.org, theo@thornhill.no, stefankangas@gmail.com To: jostein@kjonigsen.net Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 27 07:04:22 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ozAm6-0001uL-NY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2022 07:04:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ozAln-0008Vx-Ue; Sun, 27 Nov 2022 01:04:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ozAln-0008Vn-0U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2022 01:04:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ozAlm-000358-HA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2022 01:04:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ozAll-00040j-Vg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2022 01:04:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 06:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59602 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 59602-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59602.166952903115411 (code B ref 59602); Sun, 27 Nov 2022 06:04:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59602) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Nov 2022 06:03:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41896 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ozAla-00040V-TG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2022 01:03:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47658) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ozAlZ-00040P-A3 for 59602@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2022 01:03:49 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ozAlS-00031f-T7; Sun, 27 Nov 2022 01:03:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=BI/Jwn+9IB9jvIPW/mbBPwHjh4vG27jqju8fbwbHqrs=; b=o95mflisDXHeT2rDd5sP h7Bv31HNQ+0qzHMGAeEA8lHK3tv1d1Sa1gjXm+S1sjgt/mCTbWvGjv/HzBBQgjEGgljHJPggBPpDW 63+Tzm8o6Q3tOLpS+FSTKOzHTVYQUQ+3i0GjZM+Qb+hdbQ/tQGDHmqMxAftACnWTQBPHf8Pbw/YJE jvQH0PyDmKALU+GA7P1AcQPi+MwSkUnKnrYUQLRN1bRytY/TOltU/7DdaPx3oEvRTGyTBCzXjDbwc 3QPN61oAofkt8mrls1q3fKNJfCTyUu1ApRgWHcwCigggs3mceklO5MHblpEh57aoZLAC/BOAI2j4O Ic7kxhy9Y2Todw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ozAlR-0001zH-Hx; Sun, 27 Nov 2022 01:03:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <495b9dec-013f-5248-8a57-5539f16575d7@secure.kjonigsen.net> (message from Jostein =?UTF-8?Q?Kj=C3=B8nigsen?= on Sat, 26 Nov 2022 21:58:35 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:249167 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 21:58:35 +0100 > From: Jostein Kjønigsen > > While don't expect that providing for unlimited git-access out of the blue probably is how new major-modes > are taken in, I'm also not sure what the "normal" procedure is in cases like this. The "normal" procedure is to keep posting patches for review until you feel you've been doing that long enough, and managed to get to the state where your patches get only minor review comments, especially about coding and documentation conventions. Then request write access. > Are there someone particular we are recommended to CC in our emails to make sure the patches get > picked up efficiently? And what if it's not a registered "bug" yet, but just an improvement? Should we send it > to emacs-devel instead? It is always best to use report-emacs-bug for sending patches, even if it isn't a bug. debbugs is our issue tracker, not just bug tracker. emacs-devel is for discussing ideas and asking questions (you can also post diffs to better explain what you mean or if the question is about a particular code). TIA