From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Info-mode patch Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2023 16:17:59 +0300 Message-ID: <83pm59m8vs.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86fs6ertto.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86wmzpqva6.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <867cropyh3.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86mt0kulli.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86wmzmzs1s.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86edluyxhl.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86bkgxfm34.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86zg4gddtf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86v8f2xkr4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <835y72noo4.fsf@gnu.org> <83zg4dmd4k.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="793"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: juri@linkov.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Arthur Miller Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 03 15:18:32 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qGJRm-000ATB-TT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2023 15:18:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qGJR0-0004op-Iz; Mon, 03 Jul 2023 09:17:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qGJQq-0004n3-Tw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2023 09:17:34 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qGJQo-00079I-CK; Mon, 03 Jul 2023 09:17:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=YiZCgqa27TZi2FVt7+dGWOoDh4pA9ZbGPZYahfep5yI=; b=Ttw9DuFX/k35 VRfKsNrhPCmDAmccd1ZIMGVkTai1i+fkRUdJ7dyw2IC6L4zuJJTvNW+zGRYqTlLzBIXlSU8sjoQvs 1R5EuAT066ymzr0K825WReb1lNyMqFuTw8qspTDCxKJ6HnzcrHPhcSpK9BR2U8+1WuxlXqok6iX6V V8eH4wPypMC7Qg26Y+31uIY2zIVo9WqdiukkA3OSRelQGbywqYTKY9x3eRzp50YQB9MPr5FO5K3bu i2exFxvxk4/0eFK9531u+Is383mPnBTyCKafYxvcXQYhj9Uq9Or1/+JD58s41jcyPIcRFBVQe18cx QAEsgwseyKCmAo0f3EAEow==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qGJQh-00075O-AJ; Mon, 03 Jul 2023 09:17:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Arthur Miller on Mon, 03 Jul 2023 14:57:54 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:307386 Archived-At: > From: Arthur Miller > Cc: juri@linkov.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2023 14:57:54 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> From: Arthur Miller > >> Cc: Juri Linkov , emacs-devel@gnu.org > >> Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2023 00:43:15 +0200 > >> > >> >> It seems you found a bug in 'key-valid-p'! > >> >> And indeed it returns nil: > >> >> > >> >> (key-valid-p " ") > >> > > >> > Why is it a bug? " " has no meaning, > >> > since it isn't a mouse event. > >> > >> Is "remap" a mouse event? > > > > Why is "remap" relevant to the issue at hand? > > I converted from "old idiom" in info.el to new defvar-keymap. When > seeing "remap" (a dummy event) works, I just expected defvar-keymap was > done the way that it is possible to use all keys, fake-kyes, events, > and whatnot the same way. Similar as I expected 'frame to have same > meaning everywhere for the uniformity. > > Would look more tidy if it was possible to keep all key definitions in > the same place as in the old code. Do you mean that we had a binding like [tool-bar C-Back\ in\ history] somewhere?